Overpass API developpement

[Roland Olbricht <>]

Hi mmd,

> > In any case, it would be good to fix the osc file. And this is a bug to
> > be fixed in update_database. It should treat the case in a less
> > destructive way, e.g. implicitly delete the way or drop the node from
> > the way.
>
> Would that also explain the error messages around node 243509609 and way
> 22701281 I mentioned in my post? In that case, the way was not deleted.
> Still the much later deletion of the node seems to somehow backfire to
> the past.

That case deserves indeed a detail investigation in the debugger. There 
is at least a chance that the two can be tackled together.

Another question is whether this second constellation does actually any 
harm. The way 22701281 is accessible without error message at any point 
in time.

Best
Roland