Subject: Overpass API developpement
List archive
- From: mmd <>
- To:
- Subject: Re: [overpass] Systemd
- Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2017 23:48:45 +0200
Am 27.10.2017 um 12:03 schrieb Igor Brejc:
I did it in my own specific case, from a Linux
> newby perspective (1), but I think a partially automated installation
> procedure would be better for the end-user.
>
There's a number of docker images out there with varying scope and
quality. Usually they install all required packages, compile Overpass
binaries from source code, install them including web server, download
clones / import databases.
It would be really good to have a supported and endorsed version in the
main branch, which is following best practices.
Som examples:
https://github.com/drolbr/Overpass-API/pull/374
https://github.com/Frankkkkk/docker-overpass-api
https://github.com/mmd-osm/docker-overpass-api/
(and at least 5 others I forgot right now)
--
- [overpass] Systemd, Roland Olbricht, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, marc marc, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, Igor Brejc, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, marc marc, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, mmd, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, Roland Olbricht, 10/29/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, Igor Brejc, 10/27/2017
- Re: [overpass] Systemd, marc marc, 10/27/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19+.